You can read 9 more articles this month
GREEK homosexuality has been set upon a pedestal, deemed a worthy and respectable model for romance by philosophers, writers and lovers alike.
The reality is, though, that love and sex for the queer community owe more to the ancient Romans. Their approach was grittier, dirtier and sometimes just as romantic. But it’s an outlook on sex and love we are only now coming to embrace.
Ancient Greece’s appeal to gay men is much better known. Pioneering activists such as John Addington Symonds (1840-1893) and George Cecil Ives (1867-1950) turned to Greece as a respectable model. It offered them a legitimising precedent for elevated and spiritual love between men. They found this through Platonic philosophy and historical and mythical examples of devoted lovers.
Greek love is celebrated in their work for “sublimity” and “aesthetic” appreciation of male beauty. Yet when describing Roman love and erotic practices words such as “gross,” “obscene” and “lust” abound.
To them, Roman homosexuality was not expressed with romantic love but with riotous orgies. It is often linked to the notorious emperor Nero, a hedonistic ruler who married both women and men and who is believed to have enjoyed penetrating as much as he enjoyed being penetrated by his well-endowed husband.
These authors also criticise the licence of Roman writers including Petronius, whose novel The Satyricon became a byword for Roman decadence and Catullus, in whose work tender love verses for women and boys are found alongside shocking sexual imagery. Also frequently attacked for obscenity were the poets Juvenal and Martial.
Demonising Roman vice was politically convenient. Doing so highlighted the virtue of Greek homosexuality and bestowed a similar virtuous sheen upon those who denounced Rome’s debauched ways. But for those who did not feel the need to apologise for their desires, the Romans provided a positive model.
While Greek homosexuality was rather bloodless and used to demonstrate that love between two men could be respectable, Rome is able to encompass a much queerer and more varied set of erotic possibilities.
When Rome is embraced, love and sex need not be mutually exclusive. This can be seen in the anonymous and clandestinely circulated 1893 pornographic novel Teleny.
Nods to Rome in the novel include sex scenes with language recalling the imagery found in the works of Catullus and Martial. At an orgy, cross-dressing men are titillated by paintings that recreate sexually explicit Roman murals and there are also passages on Rome’s obsession with huge penises, reflected in its worship of the god Priapus, famed for his enormous member.
Teleny even suggests that love, and not just sex, between men can be influenced by Rome. The devoted couple who form the novel’s emotional heart are repeatedly presented as the emperor Hadrian and his beloved Antinous.
The novel’s use of this Roman pair even suggests that love between two men can survive beyond death, recalling Hadrian’s mourning for his lover after his untimely demise and then immortalising of Antinous throughout the Empire.
The book is sometimes attributed to Oscar Wilde but Wilde publicly defended himself against charges of being a “sodomite” by appealing to the idealised vision of Greek love. Yet, in private, he toyed with the pleasingly decadent model offered by Rome and the emperor Nero.
Wilde was far from alone in responding to ancient homosexuality rather differently, depending on whether he was operating in a public or a private context. Even though Addington Symonds deplored Roman vice while celebrating Greek virtue in his public campaigning works, he was far less prudish in his private diary.
There, describing a sexual encounter with a male lover, he slips from English into Latin. In writing about sex using the very language of ancient Rome, Addington Symonds was participating in a long modern tradition. Latin has been used as a private language in which upper-class men could talk between themselves about sex, safe in the knowledge that their wives or servants would not be able to understand.
Rome has appealed to far fewer LGBTQ+ women than men, precisely because it is mostly a male elite who have had access to a classical education. Yet Rome has played a role in love between women for a few privileged and extraordinary individuals.
Long before the Victorian era, Anne Lister (1791-1840) – of Shibden Hall and Gentleman Jack fame – turned to Rome for a variety of erotic possibilities.
Lister had studied Greek and Latin with a private tutor and claimed that Greek was her favourite language, yet Roman examples appealed to her when it came to matters of the heart – and other parts of the body.
She flirtingly referred to Ovid’s Metamorphoses to sound out whether a new female friend was aware of the queer possibilities of antiquity, masturbated to the poet Juvenal – who had surely never imagined such a use for his satires savagely condemning sex between women – and translated Martial for her lover Marianna before jumping into bed with her, presumably not to sleep.
From a broad range of erotic possibilities and a private sexual language, to models for romantic relationships, Rome has had an important impact on queer lives and loves. Yes, it is much more down and dirty but in many ways it is much more realistic.
As such, we should place it on an equal pedestal to that of pretty Greek queerness and celebrate the pleasure and pain of Roman love and sex.
Jennifer Ingleheart is Chair Professor of Latin, Durham University. This article first appeared in The Conversation, theconversation.com
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by joining the 501 club.
Just £5 a month gives you the opportunity to win one of 17 prizes, from £25 to the £501 jackpot.
By becoming a 501 Club member you are helping the Morning Star cover its printing, distribution and staff costs — help keep our paper thriving by joining!
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by become a member of the People’s Printing Press Society.
The Morning Star is a readers’ co-operative, which means you can become an owner of the paper too by buying shares in the society.
Shares are £1 each — though unlike capitalist firms, each shareholder has an equal say. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving.
Some union branches have taken out shares of over £500 and individuals over £100.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by donating to the Fighting Fund.
The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. We offer a platform for those who would otherwise never be listened to, coverage of stories that would otherwise be buried.
The rich don’t like us, and they don’t advertise with us, so we rely on you, our readers and friends. With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power.
Donate today and make a regular contribution.