ONE can look at events in Gaza through the left or through the right eye. One can condemn them as inhuman, cruel and mistaken or justify them as necessary and unavoidable.
But there is one adjective that is beyond question — they are stupid.
If the late US historian Barbara Tuchman were still alive, she might be tempted to add another chapter to her groundbreaking opus The March of Folly — one titled Eyeless in Gaza.
The latest episode in this epic started a few months ago when independent activists in the Gaza Strip called for a march to the Israeli border, which Hamas supported.
It was called “The Great March of Return,” a symbolic gesture for the more than a million Arab residents who fled or were evicted from their homes in the land that became the state of Israel.
The Israeli authorities pretended to take this seriously.
A frightening picture was painted for the Israeli public — 1.8 million Arabs, men, women and children, would throw themselves on the border fence, break through in many places and storm Israel’s cities and villages. Terrifying.
Israeli sharpshooters were posted along the border and ordered to shoot anyone who looked like a “ringleader.”
On several succeeding Fridays, the weekly Muslim holy day, more than 150 unarmed protesters, including many children, were shot dead and many hundreds more severely wounded by gunfire, apart from those hurt by tear gas.
The Israeli argument was that the victims were shot while trying to “storm the fences.” Actually, not a single such attempt was photographed, though hundreds of photographers were posted on both sides of the fence.
Facing a worldwide protest, the army changed its orders and now only rarely kills unarmed protesters. The Palestinians also changed their tactics. The main effort now is to fly children’s kites with burning tails and set Israeli fields near the Gaza Strip on fire.
Since the wind almost always blows from the west to the east, that is an easy way to hurt Israel. Children can do it and do. Now the Minister of Education demands that the air force bomb the children. The chief of staff refuses, arguing that this is “against the values of the Israeli army.”
At present, half of Israeli newspapers and TV newscasts are concerned with Gaza. Everybody seems to agree that sooner or later a full-fledged war will break out there.
The main feature of this exercise is its utter stupidity.
Every military action must have a political aim. As the German military thinker, Carl von Clausewitz, famously said, “War is but a continuation of politics by other means.”
The Gaza Strip is 41km long and 6-12km wide. It is one of the most overcrowded places on Earth. Nominally it belongs to the largely theoretical state of Palestine, like the West Bank, which is Israeli-occupied. The Strip is in fact governed by the radical Muslim Hamas party.
In the past, masses of Palestinian workers from Gaza streamed into Israel every day, but since Hamas assumed power in the Strip, the Israeli government has imposed an almost total blockade on land and sea.
The Egyptian dictatorship, a close ally of Israel and a deadly enemy of radical Islam, co-operates with Israel.
So what does Israel want? The preferred solution is to sink the entire Strip and its population into the sea. Failing that, what can be done?
The last thing Israel wants is to annex the Strip with its huge population, which cannot be driven out. Also, Israel does not want to put up settlements in the Strip. The few which were set up were withdrawn by Ariel Sharon, who thought that it was not worthwhile to keep and defend them.
The real policy is to make life in Gaza so miserable that the Gazans themselves will rise and throw the Hamas authorities out. With this in mind, the water supply is reduced to two hours a day, electricity the same. Employment hovers around 50 per cent, wages beneath the minimum. It is a picture of total misery.
Since everything that reaches Gaza must come through Israel or Egypt, supplies are often cut off completely for days as “punishment.”
Alas, history shows that such methods seldom succeed. They only deepen the enmity. So what can be done?
The answer is incredibly simple — sit down, talk and come to an agreement.
Yes, but how can you sit down with a mortal enemy, whose official ideology totally rejects a Jewish state?
Islam, which, like every religion, has an answer to everything, recognises something called a “hudna,” which is a lasting armistice.
This can go on for many decades and is, religiously, kept.
For several years now, Hamas has been almost openly hinting that it is ready for a long hudna. Egypt has volunteered to mediate. The Israeli government has totally ignored the offer. A hudna with the enemy? Out of the question! God forbid! Would be terribly unpopular politically!
But it would be the sensible thing to do. Stop all hostile acts from both sides, say for 50 years. Abolish the blockade. Build a real harbour in Gaza city. Allow free trade under some kind of military inspection. Same for an airport. Allow workers to find employment in Israel, instead of importing workers from China and Romania.
Turn Gaza into a second Singapore. Allow free travel between Gaza and the West Bank by a bridge or an extraterritorial highway. Help to restore unity between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Why not? The very idea is rejected by an ordinary Israeli on sight.
A deal with Hamas? Impossible! Hamas wants to destroy Israel. Everybody knows that.
I hear this many times and always wonder about the stupidity of people who repeat this.
How does a group of a few hundred thousand “destroy” one of the world’s most heavily armed states, a state that possesses nuclear bombs and submarines to deliver them? How? With kites?
Both Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin pay us homage, the world’s fascist dictators and liberal presidents come to visit. How can Hamas pose a mortal danger?
Why doesn’t Hamas stop hostilities by itself? Hamas has competitors, which are even more radical. It does not dare to show any sign of weakness.
Some decades ago the Arab world, on the initiative of Saudi Arabia, offered Israel peace under several conditions, all of them acceptable. Successive Israeli governments have not only not accepted it, they have ignored it altogether.
There was some logic in this. The Israeli government wants to annex the West Bank. It wants to get the Arab population out and replace them with Jewish settlers. It conducts this policy slowly, cautiously, but consistently.
It is a cruel policy, a detestable policy, yet it has some logic in it. If you really want to achieve this abominable aim, the methods may be adequate. But this does not apply to the Gaza Strip, which no-one wants to annex. There, the methods are sheer folly.
This does not mean that the overall Israeli policy towards the Palestinians is any more wise. It is not.
Benjamin Netanyahu and his hand-picked stupid ministers have no policy. Or so it seems. In fact they do have an undeclared one — creeping annexation of the West Bank.
This is now going on at a quicker pace than before. The daily news gives the impression that the entire government machine is now concentrating on this project.
This will lead directly to an apartheid-style state, where a large Jewish minority will dominate an Arab majority.
For how long? One generation? Two? Three?
It has been said that a clever person is able to extricate himself from a trap into which a wise person would not have fallen in the first place.
Stupid people do not extricate themselves. They are not even aware of the trap.
Uri Avnery is a founder of Gush Shalom (www.gush-shalom.org). He blogs at uriavnery.com.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by joining the 501 club.
Just £5 a month gives you the opportunity to win one of 17 prizes, from £25 to the £501 jackpot.
By becoming a 501 Club member you are helping the Morning Star cover its printing, distribution and staff costs — help keep our paper thriving by joining!
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by become a member of the People’s Printing Press Society.
The Morning Star is a readers’ co-operative, which means you can become an owner of the paper too by buying shares in the society.
Shares are £1 each — though unlike capitalist firms, each shareholder has an equal say. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving.
Some union branches have taken out shares of over £500 and individuals over £100.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by donating to the Fighting Fund.
The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. We offer a platform for those who would otherwise never be listened to, coverage of stories that would otherwise be buried.
The rich don’t like us, and they don’t advertise with us, so we rely on you, our readers and friends. With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power.
Donate today and make a regular contribution.