This is the last article you can read this month
You can read more article this month
You can read more articles this month
Sorry your limit is up for this month
A LIBYAN couple who allege that the British government was complicit in their detention and torture demanded at the High Court today that material relied on by the director of public prosecutions be revealed.
Libyan militant Abdel Hakim Belhaj and his wife Fatima Boudchar were detained in China in February 2004 and deported to Malaysia from where, they allege, they were sent to Libya.
Mr Belhaj, who in the 1990s was a member of the British-backed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group which tried to assassinate Colonel Muammar Gadaffi several times, claims he was tortured for six years.
In June 2016, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced that there was “insufficient evidence” to charge former MI6 counter-terrorism chief Sir Mark Allen with criminal offences. He has always denied any wrongdoing.
Mr Belhaj and Ms Boudchar are seeking a judicial review of the CPS decision to not charge Mr Allen with misconduct in public office or aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring any offence of torture.
The couple have also brought a separate civil claim against Mr Allen, former foreign secretary Jack Straw and the government for their alleged complicity in their abduction and torture.
But Ben Jaffey QC, for the couple, said in written submissions that the claimants do not have the “full factual picture” behind the decision not to press charges.
This is because the Foreign Office had claimed legal advice privilege on material that was previously disclosed to the police and CPS, he said.
Mr Jaffey told the court that “legal advice is at the heart and has always been at the heart of issues [relating to] what is often called extraordinary rendition,” adding that “bad legal advice is an enabler of unlawful conduct.”
He said the Foreign Office’s request for the court to rule on whether the redacted material was privileged on the basis of “closed” evidence was “an abuse” of the closed material process.
Mr Jaffey said that to do so would cause “unfairness to the claimants above and beyond the inevitable disadvantages” that would be caused by the closed material procedure itself.
He stated the Foreign Office had “waived” privilege in relation to the police investigation and that it was for the court to determine whether it could “reassert” that privilege.
The hearing continues.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by joining the 501 club.
Just £5 a month gives you the opportunity to win one of 17 prizes, from £25 to the £501 jackpot.
By becoming a 501 Club member you are helping the Morning Star cover its printing, distribution and staff costs — help keep our paper thriving by joining!
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by become a member of the People’s Printing Press Society.
The Morning Star is a readers’ co-operative, which means you can become an owner of the paper too by buying shares in the society.
Shares are £1 each — though unlike capitalist firms, each shareholder has an equal say. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving.
Some union branches have taken out shares of over £500 and individuals over £100.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by donating to the Fighting Fund.
The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. We offer a platform for those who would otherwise never be listened to, coverage of stories that would otherwise be buried.
The rich don’t like us, and they don’t advertise with us, so we rely on you, our readers and friends. With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power.
Donate today and make a regular contribution.