This is the last article you can read this month
You can read more article this month
You can read more articles this month
Sorry your limit is up for this month
IT WAS the 120th anniversary of the foundation of the Labour Representation Committee (LRC) at the end of February. In 1900 delegates from trade unions and left-wing parties met on February 26 and 27 in the Memorial Hall in Farringdon Street.
The building has long since been replaced by an office block — but a plaque remains. Former Labour leader Tony Blair used the occasion to make a speech, partly about labour history and mostly about where he thinks “progressive” or centre-left opinion should go in the next 10 years.
“Who cares what Blair thinks?” is surely the reaction of most socialists.
The answer is: Rupert Murdoch, since the speech made at Kings College London on February 20 (2020) was in conjunction with the Times.
A further point might well be, “what does Blair know or care about the history of the Labour Party?” After all he was famously the Labour leader who could not be bothered to show up at Durham Miners’ Galas.
For someone who, as he reminded us, was elected three times as a Labour prime minister, Blair has a rather strange view of the Labour Party’s foundation, namely — it should not have happened.
He does not support any concept of independent working-class politics — which is what one of Labour’s original affiliates, the Independent Labour Party stood for — let alone socialism.
He continues to argue that the departure of Labour supporters and representatives from the Liberal Party, the start of which process the LRC represented, was a mistake.
Yet when one examines what the LRC conference actually represented it does seem rather like the broad coalition of forces that Blair approves of.
The conference was held after a motion at the 1899 TUC and numbers of trade unionists attended, as did representatives of the ILP. Also there was Britain’s first Marxist Party, the Social Democratic Federation, although ultimately it stayed out.
The conference represented a wide strand of working-class politics rooted in the workplace. It was not of course an activists’ party in terms of how the LRC was set up, but the ILP did represent a local activist tradition.
What of Blair’s complaint that a progressive liberal tradition was discarded?
He claimed in his Kings College speech that: “We must correct the defect from birth, which separated the liberal reforming traditions of Lloyd George, Beveridge and Keynes from the Labour ones of Keir Hardie, Attlee, Bevin and Bevan.”
The historical record suggests something rather different. Writing in 1965 the socialist historian EP Thompson noted that “most of the intellectuals who had an important influence on the British labour movement between 1920 and 1945 were…social reformers within a liberal tradition (J A Hobson, Beveridge…).”
He went on to add that ethical socialists and those influenced by Marxist ideas also made their impact.
When it came to key areas like the economy, education and the welfare state Attlee’s government was significantly influenced by the work of liberals like Beveridge and Keynes.
When Blair claim to name the great Labour prime ministers he mentioned Harold Wilson and himself (of course). Attlee featured as an also-ran a few sentences further on.
Fortunately while Blair’s influence in the media remains significant, in the labour movement and the left he is, as even he recognises, quite marginal.
On the other hand that meeting of the LRC a century ago stands, up to a point, as template for socialist organisation now. The link between the trade unions and a wide range of the left was arguably made too much at the top and not enough at the grassroots but the link itself remains key.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by joining the 501 club.
Just £5 a month gives you the opportunity to win one of 17 prizes, from £25 to the £501 jackpot.
By becoming a 501 Club member you are helping the Morning Star cover its printing, distribution and staff costs — help keep our paper thriving by joining!
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by become a member of the People’s Printing Press Society.
The Morning Star is a readers’ co-operative, which means you can become an owner of the paper too by buying shares in the society.
Shares are £10 each — though unlike capitalist firms, each shareholder has an equal say. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving.
Some union branches have taken out shares of over £500 and individuals over £100.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by donating to the Fighting Fund.
The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. We offer a platform for those who would otherwise never be listened to, coverage of stories that would otherwise be buried.
The rich don’t like us, and they don’t advertise with us, so we rely on you, our readers and friends. With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power.
Donate today and make a regular contribution.