Skip to main content
‘We could get 20,000 or 30,000 people willing to take direct action on the streets’
Ian Sinclair speaks to RUPERT READ, part of Extinction Rebellion’s political strategy group and one of its main spokespeople about the next phase of the Rebellion
Schoolchildren marching through Cambridge city centre to take part in a 'die-in' climate change protest where they were campaigning against the use of fossil fuels in April 2019

THE past year has been the busiest and most exciting of his life, Rupert Read tells me when we meet in London before his appearance at a Guardian event on Extinction Rebellion.

Extinction Rebellion's Rupert Read (Pic: Rama)

Last summer Read, a reader in philosophy at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and senior Green Party figure, refused an invitation from the BBC to debate a climate change denier.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
BITTER HARVEST: Fires in Argentine Patagonia in February 2026 / Pic: tfnoticias/CC
Features / 27 May 2026
27 May 2026

Established as a landmark victory for the climate movement, the CCC promised to hold governments to account. Today, it is understating the danger of climate chaos and impeding the radical action needed, says IAN SINCLAIR

climate
Book Review / 19 December 2025
19 December 2025

IAN SINCLAIR recommends an important and timely book for climate politics right now and in the future

China embassy demo
Features / 16 August 2025
16 August 2025

From anonymous surveys claiming Chinese students are spying on each other to a meltdown about the size of China’s London embassy, the evidence is everywhere that Britain is embracing full spectrum Sinophobia as the war clouds gather, writes CARLOS MARTINEZ

The main entrance of The Guardian Newspaper office on York Way, north London
Features / 21 July 2025
21 July 2025

At the very moment Britain faces poverty, housing and climate crises requiring radical solutions, the liberal press promotes ideologically narrow books while marginalising authors who offer the most accurate understanding of change, writes IAN SINCLAIR