Skip to main content
Just Stop Oil jail terms show judges never understood Human Rights Act, Court of Appeal hears
Activists outside the Court of Appeal

JAIL terms for Just Stop Oil (JSO) protesters suggest judges have misunderstood the Human Rights Act across three decades – and could prompt an “extraordinary jump” in sentencing, the Court of Appeal heard today.

Danny Friedman KC said he was surprised “it isn’t simple” that freedom of expression and freedom of assembly should be considered when sentencing defendants with “conscientious motivation.”

A failure to to do so for 16 activists across four protests, who were jailed for up to five years in 2024, suggests “a lack of clarity and comfortableness with sentencing in human rights cases,” he suggested.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
HISTORY MADE: A plaque at the Old Bailey dedicated to the case of William Penn and William Mead — and the jury who acted on their conscience
Features / 2 September 2025
2 September 2025

The heroism of the jury who defied prison and starvation conditions secured the absolute right of juries to deliver verdicts based on conscience — a convention which is now under attack, writes MAT COWARD

FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice stands atop the Central Criminal Court building, Old Bailey, London
Features / 9 August 2025
9 August 2025

ANSELM ELDERGILL examines the government’s proposals to further limit the right of citizens to trial by jury