Skip to main content

Men’s Baseball Cleveland to drop racist Native American name

THE Cleveland Indians are changing their name after 105 years.

Citing three people familiar with the decision, The New York Times reported on Sunday night that the team are moving away from a name considered racist for decades.

The Indians have been internally discussing a potential name change for months.

A team spokesman said the franchise has no immediate comment on the report.

The Times said the team could make a formal announcement later this week. It’s not known when the name change will take effect or if the team have settled on a new moniker.

Cleveland’s move away from the Indians follows a similar decision earlier this year by the NFL’s Washington Football Team, who were previously known as the Redskins.

For years, Native American groups and others have protested against Cleveland’s use of Indians as their name as well as other imagery used by the American League charter franchise, founded in 1901.

Last year, the team removed the contentious Chief Wahoo logo from their caps and jerseys, but the smiling, cartoonish mascot has remained popular and merchandise is still sold bearing its image.

The Indians have dealt with a backlash from fans upset over Chief Wahoo’s removal and the club are certain to hear more with the decision to change their name.

“Oh no! What is going on?” President Donald Trump tweeted. “This is not good news, even for Indians.” Cancel culture at work!”

In July, just hours after Washington’s plans became known after being pressured by several sponsors, including FedEx which holds naming rights to the football’s team’s stadium, Cleveland owner Paul Dolan released a statement saying the team would review “the best path forward with our team name.”

In the months since, the team have consulted players, front office members, coaching staff, community leaders, shareholders and Native American groups.

A few days after Dolan’s statement, Indians manager Terry Francona said it was time to “move forward” with the name change.

“I’ve been thinking about it and been thinking about it before we put out that statement,” said Francona, who has been with the club since 2013.

“I know in the past, when I’ve been asked about, whether it’s our name or the Chief Wahoo, I think I would usually answer and say I know that we’re never trying to be disrespectful.

“And I still feel that way. But I don’t think that’s a good enough answer today. I think it’s time to move forward. It’s a very difficult subject. It’s also delicate.”

OWNED BY OUR READERS

We're a reader-owned co-operative, which means you can become part of the paper too by buying shares in the People’s Press Printing Society.

 

 

Become a supporter

Fighting fund

You've Raised:£ 13,288
We need:£ 4,712
3 Days remaining
Donate today