THERE was a numbness around much of the football world in the build-up to the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.
A men’s World Cup held for the first time outside the months of May to July, catching anyone potentially interested slightly off guard with its timing and close proximity to domestic league and cup matches.
More pertinent issues than the time of year it was being held preceded and followed kick-off at this World Cup, from Fifa corruption related to the awarding of the tournament to human rights issues in the host country.
This has increased the sense of disillusion around the World Cup and indeed increased disengagement from top-level football as a whole. Some fans decided to ignore the tournament altogether and some in the media have also boycotted it.
But amid this elaborate and costly football fete, the sport of association football itself has reminded us why it is so popular, and especially so with those who are apparently looking to carry out what has been termed “sportswashing” — attempts to use sports to launder their reputation on the global stage, and an exercise in soft power.
A World Cup full of memorable moments was also marked by exclusion, exploitation and unprecedented political meddling, writes JAMES NALTON
England survived a thrilling Azteca encounter, but the stadium and its supporters created one of the tournament’s defining nights, writes JAMES NALTON
Football may not solve the working class’s problems, but it does matter — and politicians know it, writes BERT SHOUWENBURG
ROGER McKENZIE explains why he can’t support this year’s World Cup



