Special report by PEOPLE’S WORLD
Latest editorial
The ‘riddle of Rishi Sunak?’
Mainstream media pundits have recently discovered that our PM is terrible at politics, leaving a puzzle over how he reached the top. There’s really no mystery, writes SOLOMON HUGHES, but they wouldn’t like the answers
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak launches the Conservative Party General Election manifesto at Silverstone in Towcester, Northamptonshire, June 11, 2024
NICK WRIGHT considers how the isolation of Israel and a new film on the controversial Italian communist leader are creating new reference points for Italy’s left
CARLOS MARTINEZ says Cuba’s achievements in the face of a criminal blockade are startling, but the island’s future if the United States succeeds in crushing it looks bleak
AMNON BROWNFIELD STEIN reports that far-right MPs who mobbed the event organised by Hadash may have helped raise awareness of the brutality of the Israeli right
Born on this day in 1931, the heroic revolutionary faces a dangerous new wave of White House aggression. We must treat his birthday as a rallying cry to resist the illegal siege of Cuba, writes ROGER McKENZIE
RAMZY BAROUD decries the rats of Gaza, the rodent and human type. Both abound as profiteering from tragedy reaches obscene levels
A QUESTION floats around the media: why is Rishi Sunak so bad? The obvious follow-up question — why did someone so bad at politics become Britain’s actual top politician — gets asked less.
It’s difficult for the Westminster media to ask, because any answer suggests the Westminster system itself is rotten, and the political press is part of that system. This means the enigma of Sunak is discussed, but never explained.
Rosa Prince on the Politico website gave a good expression of what is now the received wisdom of the pundits, saying the PM’s D-Day debacle was: “Yet another sign that Sunak is just really, really bad at politics.” She says “Sunak is just a really bad politician,” with “off-kilter political antennae.”
So why did someone so “bad” at politics want to become PM, and how did anyone let him?
The first question seems easy to answer. Top banking and finance folk think of themselves as “Masters of the Universe.” Sunak followed the Establishment route for a well-funded clever lad, from a top public school to Oxford and Stanford to banking with Goldman Sachs and then hedge funds.
Because he married into the super-rich Murthy family, a simple career in banking was a bit pointless: he had reason and opportunity to try his hand at politics.
It’s like a modern version of the old aristocratic tradition to ensure the ruling class run everything: have one son running the family business, one joins the church and one goes to the army. Sunak could “have a try” at politics without facing any financial risk. He could be an MP and have a Penthouse in Santa Monica, so why not?
Similar stories
With a political crisis engulfing the Labour Party, the case for PR is back on the agenda. TONY BURKE argues trade unions must now engage on changes to our voting system
Once derided by Farage as a ‘fraud,’ Jenrick has defected to Reform, bringing experience and political ruthlessness to the populist right — and raising the unsettling prospect of a Farage-led movement with a seasoned operative pulling the strings, says ANDREW MURRAY
STEPHEN ARNELL wonders at the family resemblance between former prince Andrew and his great-uncle ‘Dickie’
‘Honest’ Tom Wharton’s 1682 drunken rampage through St Mary’s church haunted his political career, but his satirical song Lillibullero helped topple Catholic James II during the Glorious Revolution, writes MAT COWARD