Skip to main content
Ulysses for doubting Thomases
For a 100 years James Joyce’s Ulysses has been seen as an intimidating read. KATY MULLIN begs to differ and here’s why
INNOVATOR: James Joyce playing a guitar, 1915 and Ulisses first edition published by Paris-Shakespeare, 1922 [(L to R) Geoffrey Barker/Creative Commons and C Ruf/Wikipedia]

JAMES JOYCE’S Ulysses was first published 100 years ago. For a century, it has been seen as an intimidating read, but I’d like to challenge that. It is surprisingly accessible.

Set in Dublin on a single day (June 16 1904), Ulysses commemorated Joyce’s first date with his life partner, Nora Barnacle. Nora herself never cared to read it. “Jim,” she said, “should have stuck to the singing.”

It isn’t hard to see why she was put off. The first three chapters focus on Stephen Dedalus, Joyce’s sardonic portrait of his younger self as a philosophising drifter prone to giving lectures on Hamlet over pints.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
PS
Books / 29 January 2026
29 January 2026

JULIA TOPPIN recommends Patti Smith’s eloquent memoir that wrestles with the beauty and sorrow of a lifetime

Hamnet
Opinion / 20 January 2026
20 January 2026

JULIA THOMAS unpicks the mental processes that explain why book-to-film adaptations so often disappoint

Beer Street and Gin Lane, 1759 versions of Hogarth contrasting visions / Pic: Public domain
History / 12 September 2025
12 September 2025

Gin Lane by William Hogarth is a critique of 18th-century London’s growing funeral trade, posits DAN O’BRIEN

gray
Exhibition review / 8 July 2025
8 July 2025

BLANE SAVAGE recommends the display of nine previously unseen works by the Glaswegian artist, novelist and playwright