Skip to main content
Britain continues to make a mockery of non-proliferation
Ministers and the nuclear regulators are failing to call out flawed legisation, says DAVID LOWRY
[International CND]

IN EVIDENCE I submitted last November to the House of Commons committee examining the Nuclear Safeguards Bill, I concluded as follows:

“The UK nuclear regulator is going to be given unprecedented responsibility for policing a diplomatically contentious new arrangement, which will increase suspicion among member states of the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) — (for which Britain, as a co-drafter of the treaty text, is one of three depositary states) — which ministers pray-in-aid whenever they discuss the rationale for a UK nuclear safeguards system. However, ministers routinely cherry-pick those parts of the NPT that suit their purposes. 

“But the NPT is an integrated diplomatic agreement, with its articles all relevant and related. Cherry-picking is both diplomatically unwise, as it normalises abrogation for other signatory nations, and undermines the very treaty for which the UK is supposed to act as a protective depositary state.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
GLOSSING OVER REALITY: Keir Starmer at a roving robot technology workshop sponsored by BAE system in Barrow-in-Furness while viting to lay the keel for first Dreadnought class nuclear-armed submarine, March 2025
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament / 10 July 2026
10 July 2026

We need a government that invests in saving lives not destroying them, argues SOPHIE BOLT

Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament / 26 September 2025
26 September 2025
Protesters march past the Atomic Bomb Dome during a protest on the 80th anniversary of the WWII U.S. atomic bombing, in Hiroshima, Japan, August 6, 2025
Features / 7 August 2025
7 August 2025

For 80 years, survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings have pleaded “never again,” for anyone. But are we listening, asks Linda Pentz Gunter