The Tories introduced the 50% strike ballot threshold to make industrial action harder. MATT WRACK argues that a Labour government has no justification for leaving it on the statute book
REMEMBER when the Prime Minister repeatedly told us he was “following the science?” Remember those televised press conferences when he was flanked by the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser providing the expert advice on what we all needed to know and do to protect ourselves and our loved ones from the deadly coronavirus?
There was no press conference, no updates on the gov.uk website, no sign of Chris Whitty or Patrick Vallance, when the Prime Minister announced in Parliament on February 9 2022 that he was planning to bring forward an end to England’s rules on self-isolation later this month.
“Following the science” — but the scientists and medical experts of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) didn’t meet until the day after this announcement. And by that time the press was reporting that it wouldn’t just be self-isolation that would end — the days of free testing and even the “gold standard” ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey are limited.
Extreme heat is now one of the defining public health challenges of a warming world, explains Prof IAN WILLIAMS
The US blockade of Cuba raises risks of a new global pandemic, experts warn at Unison conference
In the centenary year of Fidel Castro, Cuba faces ferocious aggression from the United States — but we will not kneel, vows FIDEL CASTRO SMIRNOV
Labour’s watered-down legislation won’t protect us from unfair dismissal or ban some zero-hours contracts until 2027 — leaving millions of young people vulnerable to the populist right’s appeal, warns TUC young workers chair FRASER MCGUIRE


