Morning Star editor BEN CHACKO says assessing a Labour leader whose mission was to smash the left must involve addressing the delusions that fuelled his rise
Latest editorial
How Nato promotes its nuclear agenda
The supposed ‘defensive alliance’ is anything but – as RAE STREET reminds us
Nato's logo seen at its 70th anniversary summit last year
Rebuilding Labour’s working-class roots and organising power is essential if the party is to recover, says MERCEDES VILLALBA
ANDREW MURRAY looks back at a damaging career marked by dishonesty, incompetence and revolting complicity in war crimes
Britain’s historic vote to leave the EU was a rejection of the political Establishment and the strategic direction pursued by Britain’s ruling class since the second world war, writes ALEX GORDON
Over 1,000 hostile US sanctions remain in place on Venezuela, while Britain continues its colonial theft of gold, writes MATT WILLGRESS
MARY DAVIS says the centrality of the Jewish community and the Communist Party to anti-fascism in the 1930s is too often overlooked on the left
NATO was once described as the “military arm of the US empire” — and one might add “nuclear empire.”
As we remember the bombing of Hiroshima on August 6 1945, the horrendous suffering which was brought about on that day to the people of Japan and later on August 9, Nagasaki Day, it is worth thinking about Nato’s policies and in particular its nuclear policies.
Since the end of totalitarian communism, unlike the Warsaw Pact which was disbanded, Nato has been expanding. It now has 30 member states.
Similar stories
Expanding Britain’s nuclear capability increases the risk of nuclear confrontation. It does not keep us safe – it makes us a target, argues CAROL TURNER
For 80 years, survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings have pleaded “never again,” for anyone. But are we listening, asks Linda Pentz Gunter
JEREMY CORBYN reports from Hiroshima where he represented CND at the 80th anniversary of the bombing of the city by the US
