Skip to main content
Restoring the right to a safe workplace
Professors PHIL JAMES, STEVE TOMBS, DAVID WALTERS and DAVID WHYTE single out five broader features of present deregulatory policy they argue need to be abandoned because of their damaging consequences for social protection

A common theme of policy under Labour, Conservative and Coalition governments since the mid-1980s has been the drive to remove large swathes of laws there to guarantee social protection.   

Based on a right-wing ideology that claims regulatory “red tape” hinders business success, this drive has continued regardless of the evidence that it puts more people in danger and doesn’t even help business.  

The “bonfire of red tape” has even endured in the face of evidence showing that an absence of regulatory controls in the financial sector encouraged new forms of investment and unsustainable financial products that ultimately created the conditions leading to the 2008 crash.

The BIT takes no account of economic externalities such as public health impacts

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
I’ACCUSE...! A comment left among tributes close to Grenfell Tower in west London the day after a fire engulfed the 24-storey building
Features / 23 May 2026
23 May 2026

YVETTE WILLIAMS and JOE DELANEY dissect the institutional dawdling that rubbed salt into the Grenfell open wounds prolonging the agony of survivors

COST CONTROL MODE: Health Secretary Wes Streeting during a visit to NHS National Operations Centre in London on July 25 2025
Features / 18 September 2025
18 September 2025

Politicians who continue to welcome contracts with US companies without considering the risks and consequences of total dependency in the years to come are undermining the raison d’etre of the NHS, argues Dr JOHN PUNTIS

FW Pomeroy's Statue of Justice stands atop the Central Criminal Court building, Old Bailey, London
Features / 9 August 2025
9 August 2025

ANSELM ELDERGILL examines the government’s proposals to further limit the right of citizens to trial by jury