Skip to main content
North Korea must be brought to the negotiating table
SEAN MORRIS warns of the increasing threat of proliferation of nuclear weapons

THE Nuclear-Free Local Authorities (NFLA) group is very concerned with the reported news that the North Korean government has apparently successfully test-fired a missile — with the capacity to bear nuclear weapons — to a potential distance of over 4,000 miles, putting them in the range of North America and much of Europe.

The proliferation of nuclear weapons to now include North Korea is a real example of the weakness of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and why it is more important than ever to move forward with more effective multilateral policies for disarmament.

That the existing nuclear weapon states are all planning to modernise their nuclear weapons — at huge financial cost — is a key part of what has influenced North Korea to pursue a nuclear weapons programme, even at the expense of the welfare of its own people.

Receiving next to no media coverage in Britain, over 120 countries at the United Nations have approved an international treaty seeking to ban nuclear weapons.

These discussions partly arise out of deep frustration from the vast majority of UN members with the intransigence of the P5 nuclear weapon states — the US, Russia, China, Britain and France.

The nuclear weapon states, along with most Nato members and those under the US “nuclear umbrella” like Japan and Australia, have boycotted all discussions to develop a nuclear weapon ban treaty.
US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley has argued their non-attendance is because of these “new” nuclear proliferation threats from the likes of North Korea.

While it is a major development for North Korea to fire a missile which could theoretically travel such large distances, it does not mean it could yet be able to deliver it.

The South Korean government, for example, says there is no evidence the missile could withstand high temperatures and successfully re-enter the atmosphere. So there remains a limited window of opportunity to put international diplomatic pressure on North Korea to negotiate on its nuclear programme. That opportunity should be taken.

However, North Korea’s belligerent stance partly derives from the perceived threat it sees to itself, and the country sees little evidence that the nuclear weapon states will ever seriously move towards multilateral nuclear disarmament. For example, here in Britain, highly expensive plans to spend billions of pounds on four new Trident nuclear weapon armed submarines are moving forward, with similar programmes in the US, France, Russia and China.

The development of a UN Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty, formally agreed in New York yesterday, is a hugely positive development.

It says that the vast majority of the governments of the world want a nuclear weapons-free world. That also still remains the policy of the British government and all British and Irish political parties, though little is being done by Westminster to realise it.

It is now incumbent on nuclear weapons states to stop boycotting such discussions and actively work for nuclear disarmament, or North Korea will be joined by other states that have followed the actions of Israel, India and Pakistan to develop their own nuclear weapon programmes since the NPT was ratified.

NFLA steering committee vice-chair Councillor David Blackburn said: “As a strong and vocal supporter of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) and the Mayors for Peace, NFLA warmly welcomes the dedication of many states to encourage and realise nuclear disarmament through the Nuclear Ban Treaty process.

“It contrasts with the belligerence of nuclear weapon states and North Korea over much of the past decade, where much was promised but little delivered.

“The only substantive success in that period was persuading Iran to co-operate on its own nuclear programme.

“While there remain so few signs of significant nuclear disarmament among existing nuclear weapon states, it is hardly surprising North Korea is continuing to develop its own programme.

“We have limited time to bring North Korea back to the negotiating table and the United Nations must try to do so.

“A fully nuclear armed North Korea is part of the nightmare scenario the NPT was supposed to prevent. Now we must look to the new Nuclear Ban Treaty process as the genesis of a more effective and widely supported corollary process to encourage North Korea and others to disarm these weapons of mass destruction.”

Sean Morris is secretary of the Manchester-based Nuclear Free Local Authorities group.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament / 26 September 2025
26 September 2025
Protesters march past the Atomic Bomb Dome during a protest on the 80th anniversary of the WWII U.S. atomic bombing, in Hiroshima, Japan, August 6, 2025
Features / 7 August 2025
7 August 2025

For 80 years, survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings have pleaded “never again,” for anyone. But are we listening, asks Linda Pentz Gunter

all the delegates for the Fourth Wanshou Dialogue on Global Security, Jenny Clegg is front row second left
Features / 4 July 2025
4 July 2025

JENNY CLEGG reports from a Chinese peace conference bringing together defence ministers, US think tanks and global South leaders, where speakers warned that the erosion of multilateralism risks regional hotspots exploding into wider war

Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato Summit at the Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025
Features / 27 June 2025
27 June 2025

SOLOMON HUGHES explains how the PM is channelling the spirit of Reagan and Thatcher with a ‘two-tier’ nuclear deterrent, whose Greenham Common predecessor was eventually fought off by a bunch of ‘punks and crazies’