This is the last article you can read this month
You can read more article this month
You can read more articles this month
Sorry your limit is up for this month
Reset on:
Please help support the Morning Star by subscribing here
A LANDMARK case likely to have “huge ramifications” for the gig economy began at the Supreme Court today.
Gary Smith, a plumber who worked for Pimlico Plumbers for five years until 2011, brought a claim to be recognised as having been a worker by the company rather than as a contractor.
He claimed that, after a heart attack, his request to work three days a week was rejected and he was dismissed.
He has already won a number of court rulings that determined he could claim “worker” status, although he was described in his contract as a “self-employed operative.”
The Court of Appeal said that Mr Smith was a worker because he was required to use the firm’s van for assignments and was contractually obliged to do a minimum number of hours a week.
Pimlico Plumbers claims the Supreme Court hearing will have “significant ramifications” relating to employment law for a number of industries.
The company’s controversial chief executive Charlie Mullins, a Tory donor and former business adviser to David Cameron and George Osborne, said the case was different from other gig-economy cases that included delivery couriers and taxi drivers.
Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Mr Smith’s lawyer Jacqueline McGuigan said that the legal issues in his case were the same as those for other gig-economy workers.
She said a victory for Mr Smith would “have a huge impact on other workers.”
Thomas Linden QC, for Pimlico Plumbers, said Mr Smith was a “skilled tradesman” and therefore in a strong position as a self-employed contractor able to command high earnings.
Mr Smith’s legal team will argue that the previous decisions were correct and should be upheld.
The hearing continues.