The Tories introduced the 50% strike ballot threshold to make industrial action harder. MATT WRACK argues that a Labour government has no justification for leaving it on the statute book
THE Labour Party, as it exists now under Keir Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, is not the party to save the NHS — and this is not a new phenomenon.
In fact, Starmer and Streeting appear to be barely interested in going through the motions of even pretending to want to save it in any meaningful form. Last September, Streeting, who has even raised “self-care” by patients as a measure to be considered for the NHS, went as far as saying he was prepared to let the NHS “die” if it failed to adapt to his “reforms,” which amount to further privatisation, the closure of hospitals and cutting costs, while also mandating prescriptive and even coercive use of drugs on the general population to keep them out of hospital, and pushing the perversely incentivised “integrated care” model even harder than previous Tory governments, under the economically illiterate threat that the NHS will “go bankrupt” if the “reforms” are not imposed.
This plan was crystallised even further in the report Streeting commissioned by Lord Darzi, an ardent advocate of Tory NHS “reform” who oversaw much of Tony Blair’s marketisation of the NHS, to write last autumn on the future of the NHS.
The new PM’s opening addresses offered hope, council homes and reform — but little detail on how any of it will be delivered, warns CLAUDIA WEBBE
CLAUDIA WEBBE says the horrific price British patients will pay for this NHS deal is now clear — and there’s time to get out of it, if MPs will only force the issue
In the second part of her critique of Wes Streeting’s TenYear Plan for Health, HELEN MERCER looks at the central planks of this privatisation blueprint


