In the wake of his recent humanitarian visit to Cuba, RICHARD BURGON points to the now urgent need to defend the island’s political sovereignty and its right to self-determination
TWENTY YEARS ago, the longest war in US history – longer even than the Vietnam war – was launched in Afghanistan, with the support of the British government, despite the warnings of the anti-war movement.
The anti-war movement argued at the time against the rush to war and urged other ways of responding to the horrific 9/11 terrorist attack. In particular, the anti-war movement warned that military occupation of Afghanistan could not lead to stable governance and would be rejected as a foreign imposition by many Afghans.
The disastrous situation in Afghanistan is a consequence more than anything of a 20-year-long failed military intervention. The responsibility rests with the US, British and other Nato governments which plunged into a war that was always doomed to fail. The fact of the invasion, not the manner of its ending, has driven the crisis in Afghanistan.
Outrage greeted Donald Trump’s suggestion earlier this year that Britain stayed off the front lines. But evidence suggests our forces were at times pulled from the most dangerous fighting — not by military failure, but by pressure at home, says IAN SINCLAIR


